UGC Launches the UGC Teaching Award
The University Grants Committee (UGC) announced today (28 February 2011) the launch of the first round of the UGC Teaching Award (the Award).
"The UGC attaches great importance to quality teaching and learning, which is the core mission and duty of all UGC-funded institutions. The 'Aspirations for the Higher Education System in Hong Kong' report also emphasized the need to revitalize teaching. The Award, which aims to honour those who excel in teaching in the UGC sector, is an important step to this end," said The Hon Mrs Laura M. Cha, Chairman of the UGC.
Mrs Cha said, "The awardees will become 'ambassadors of good teaching' collectively to make a real and sustained impact in promoting teaching excellence in the UGC sector. The Award is therefore pitched at a high level and is going to be very selective, with only a maximum of three awardees in this round."
"Each awardee will be given a grant of $500,000 for undertaking learning and teaching related initiatives that will not only benefit the awardee's institution but also the entire UGC sector," added the UGC Chairman.
Echoing the Chairman, Professor Edmond Ko, Convenor of the sub-group established under the UGC to develop the assessment criteria of the Award, said, "The selection will be very rigorous, and based on both paper-based assessments and interviews by a selection panel."
"All nominations will be assessed based on four criteria which represent the important aspects of teaching, including the adoption of learner-centred approaches, curriculum design, scholarly activities in learning and teaching and scholarly contribution to the development of effective teaching practice. These criteria have been worked out with reference to local and prestigious overseas teaching awards and taking into account comments of UGC-funded institutions," Professor Ko added.
The UGC will invite from each UGC-funded institution two nominations which will be considered by a selection panel comprising local and overseas members of the UGC and Quality Assurance Council, as well as an external overseas expert. The results of the Award are expected to be announced in September 2011.
Mrs Cha said, "We are thankful to
all UGC-funded institutions for their support
and constructive comments which were most
useful in working out the Award's structure
and selection criteria. We very much look
forward to receiving their nominations for
this Award."
Note
A fact sheet on the structure and selection criteria of the Award is at the Annex.
February 28, 2011 (Monday)
Annex
Timeline of the 2011
UGC Teaching Award
Activity | Timeline |
---|---|
Nomination period | March to mid-June 2011 |
Review of submissions from nominating institutions and candidates by the selection panel | Mid-June to mid-August 2011 |
Shortlisting of candidates by the selection panel | Mid-August 2011 |
Second stage of selection; interview by the selection panel | Early September 2011 |
Announcement of results & presentation ceremony | September 2011 |
Structure and Selection Criteria of the UGC Teaching Award
Structure
- Each UGC-funded institution will be
invited to nominate no more than two academics
from within its faculty. There should
be no more than three awardees.
- The Award is "discipline-neutral"
i.e. institutions may nominate outstanding
academics from any discipline.
- The Award is opened to all full-time
staff with teaching duties (excluding
visiting staff), regardless of their number
of years of teaching experience.
- The award is in the form of a grant
of $500,000 for each awardee, which includes
a cash award of $25,000.
Selection Criteria
All nominees for the Award will be assessed
on the evidence/information they provide
in relation to the following four criteria.
The examples given are not meant to be exhaustive.
(a) Adoption of learner-centred approaches,
ability to engage/inspire/impact on students,
which may include understanding how students
learn and adopting suitable teaching and
assessment approaches that can achieve better
student learning outcomes; being able to
engage students in learning with enthusiasm;
and inspiring and supporting students, with
respect for their diverse learning needs,
to build confidence and capability (including
critical thinking, analytical skills, values,
etc.).
(b) Course/programme/curriculum design that can reflect a command of the field, which may include demonstrating up-to-date knowledge of the field of study in the design of the curriculum and student learning resources (e.g., textbooks, e-learning resources); and developing appropriate student learning outcomes and adopting innovative approaches to teaching and assessment which can facilitate students' achievement of the learning outcomes.
(c) Scholarly activities and approach to learning and teaching, which may include adopting teaching practices that are informed by research in learning and teaching; participating in educational research in the field of study; strengthening the teaching-research nexus; and demonstrating educational innovations in the field of study.
(d) Past/present achievements and leadership in teaching and potential scholarly contribution to the development of effective teaching practice with impact within his/her own institution and/or in other institutions, which may include participation in and contribution to professional activities related to learning and teaching; active involvement in the promotion of teaching excellence within the institution and/or in other institutions; and demonstrating leadership through activities that aim to enhance learning and teaching.
The four criteria carry no specified weighting. The selection panel will consider each nomination on its own merit with reference to the criteria.